स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान जर्नल

  • आईएसएसएन: 1108-7366
  • जर्नल एच-इंडेक्स: 51
  • जर्नल उद्धरण स्कोर: 10.69
  • जर्नल प्रभाव कारक: 9.13
में अनुक्रमित
  • जेनेमिक्स जर्नलसीक
  • चीन राष्ट्रीय ज्ञान अवसंरचना (सीएनकेआई)
  • उद्धरण कारक
  • सिनाहल पूर्ण
  • Scimago
  • इलेक्ट्रॉनिक जर्नल्स लाइब्रेरी
  • रिसर्च जर्नल इंडेक्सिंग की निर्देशिका (डीआरजेआई)
  • ईएमकेयर
  • ओसीएलसी- वर्ल्डकैट
  • विश्वविद्यालय अनुदान आयोग
  • चिकित्सा शिक्षा और अनुसंधान के लिए जिनेवा फाउंडेशन
  • यूरो पब
  • गूगल ज्ञानी
  • शेरपा रोमियो
  • गुप्त खोज इंजन लैब्स
इस पृष्ठ को साझा करें

अमूर्त

The Practically Wise Medical Teacher: Medical Education at the University of TromsØ-A Norwegian Case

Sylvi Stenersen Hovdenak, Ida KR Hatlevik, Kristian Bartnes, Inger-Heidi Bjerkli, Stig Norderval and Tone Nordøy

This article addresses the issue of teaching quality in medical education and investigates what characterizes a professionally competent or practically wise medical teacher through the use of longitudinal data from interviews with 40 medical students. In discussing the findings, Aristotle’s concepts of episteme, techne and phronesis, and theoretical perspectives on professionalism and quality in teaching are applied. The findings highlight that one is either a practically wise medical teacher or a technical medical teacher. The practically wise medical teacher typically focuses on reflection, experience, participation, formative assessment and discussion in an atmosphere of good relations, which stimulate teaching and learning. The technical medical teacher, on the contrary, knows very little about the students and treats them as onlookers in clinical settings. The analysis results indicate that being a practically wise medical teacher requires a perception of what characterizes professionalism in medical education, the ability to use formative assessment and role model consciousness. These findings underline the importance of a good supervisor–learner relationship, which promotes medical teachers’ teaching competence and knowledge of professionalism. The findings also indicate the importance of faculty development in order to improve teaching quality at both the individual and system levels.