स्वास्थ्य विज्ञान जर्नल

  • आईएसएसएन: 1108-7366
  • जर्नल एच-इंडेक्स: 51
  • जर्नल उद्धरण स्कोर: 10.69
  • जर्नल प्रभाव कारक: 9.13
में अनुक्रमित
  • जेनेमिक्स जर्नलसीक
  • चीन राष्ट्रीय ज्ञान अवसंरचना (सीएनकेआई)
  • उद्धरण कारक
  • सिनाहल पूर्ण
  • Scimago
  • इलेक्ट्रॉनिक जर्नल्स लाइब्रेरी
  • रिसर्च जर्नल इंडेक्सिंग की निर्देशिका (डीआरजेआई)
  • ईएमकेयर
  • ओसीएलसी- वर्ल्डकैट
  • विश्वविद्यालय अनुदान आयोग
  • चिकित्सा शिक्षा और अनुसंधान के लिए जिनेवा फाउंडेशन
  • यूरो पब
  • गूगल ज्ञानी
  • शेरपा रोमियो
  • गुप्त खोज इंजन लैब्स
इस पृष्ठ को साझा करें

अमूर्त

Reliability of Information Abstracted from Diabetic Patients' Medical Records in Palestine

Nuha A El Sharif

Background: Questionnaire based surveys are an importance tool in epidemiology and public health research. Although there may be a certain degree of bias in this quality of care assessment tool since some of these measurements may be misleading, it remains an inexpensive tool for such assessments. The quality of services provided to diabetic patients in Palestine has not been studied previously. This study provides a context for the measurement of the quality of care of patients with diabetes. Objectives: To evaluate the agreement on testing at the proper time between self-report and medical record in primary care centers in the West Bank. Methods: Data from interviews and medical records were available on 882 diabetic patients attending nine primary health care centers in Palestine. Cohen's kappa coefficient (k), agreement beyond chance, between data provided in patient medical record and self-report was calculated. Results: Agreement on testing at the proper time between self-report and medical record was poor to fair in strength (k: 0.06- 0.28), and was poor to substantial (k: 0.10- 0.70) for diabetes comorbids. After adjustment, clinic location and ownership were strong determinants for agreement in the proper time of testing. Also, the personal characteristic age and gender were the most important factors in determining comorbids in those patients. Conclusion: The evaluation of the quality of care based on medical records should be treated with great caution in Palestine since it’s a manual process. However, reliance on both sources of information is useful to establish monitoring tools on which decisions can be based.

अस्वीकृति: इस सारांश का अनुवाद कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता उपकरणों का उपयोग करके किया गया है और इसे अभी तक समीक्षा या सत्यापित नहीं किया गया है।